Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on illegal gambling.

No, they weren’t personally in participation, but the world-famous celebrities were notably consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments – the controversial sites using both totally free casino-style games and profitable rewards, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can ‘play for free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as traditional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t based on regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of unlawful sports betting in a New York claim that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to ‘create a veneer of legitimacy’ around its product. (See VGW’s statement below)

‘I’m not exactly sure” if you don’t trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton” is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebrities from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom provide any differences in between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many – however not all – games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump ‘set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, ads generally focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real gambling losses.

Others tempt consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad displaying Drake’s cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

‘Daddy, why do we have so much money?’ check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: ‘Because I never quit.’

The inconsistency in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they’re not included with the former.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

‘Most social sweeps clients never ever purchase,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting sites.’

Social casinos use customers a possibility to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency typically referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be used to unlock numerous functions within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting customers to obtain other currency called ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad flaunting Drake’s automobiles, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but seven states, which has helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don’t need generally require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow consumers to submit mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully specific instructions. What’s more, players are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, thus offering them a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino video games for a chance to win – or lose – real money.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is merely a means of promoting their support.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are just a kind of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. ‘No purchase is required to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement – or” factor to consider” – is a crucial distinction between social sweeps and conventional online sports betting websites like gambling establishments.’

Think of the method that McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, but rather they’re buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘factor to consider’, the game itself doesn’t satisfy the meaning of sports betting in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all sort of everyday companies in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,’ the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promos are routinely utilized by a who’s who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to lots of sports betting market experts, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For beginners, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald’s Monopoly video game doesn’t run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They do not last forever and they’re generally not connected to casino-style video games of chance,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re just money free gifts.

‘The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the qualities frequently associated with McDonald’s-design sweepstakes promotions,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos use” casino-like” payments, typically 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the common payment percentage for a short-term marketing sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue made by the business [generally less than one percent]’

Wallach is quick to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, providing customers the opportunity to play casino-style games for real prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over allegations of illegal sports betting.

DJ Khaled is among a number of star spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face .

‘These differences are not arbitrary,’ Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. ‘They have repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state attorney generals as essential consider identifying that a sweepstakes promotion remained in truth a guise for prohibited sports betting.’

Among the gambling establishment industry’s leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

‘Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are forgoing substantial tax and income opportunities as this gaming replaces that performed through managed channels,’ checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest claim, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an ‘unlawful gaming enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have likewise been called as accuseds in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com’s demand for comment.

‘We normally don’t talk about matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

‘We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain positive about the future,’ the representative continued. ‘We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just fantastic games, user experiences and entertainment, but also guaranteeing this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

‘More broadly, we ‘d restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to intensely safeguard any claim which might be brought against us.’

The concerns between standard online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might prove bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both endorse VGW’s Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting ‘sweeps’ sites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance against illegal gambling – particularly when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,’ Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting apparently unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,’ Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players’ agents reacted to DailyMail.com’s demands for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to describe to clients the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

‘We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our service practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson stated. ‘A few of our values are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

‘Celebrities who lend their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at risk along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gaming.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton